3 ms·
If they didn't have to give anything up to get their wealth, then it can't be worth anything? Hardly. I don't think opportunity cost is really relevant in the
by theoh 8y ago
If they didn't have to give anything up to get their wealth, then it can't be worth anything? Hardly.
I don't think opportunity cost is really relevant in the case you mention.
- cimmanom 8y agoI don't think it's not worth anything. I think they fail to recognize the value of it because for them there was no opportunity cost. (Whereas for the parents or grandparents who earned the money, there was typically a cost in terms of, for instance, time spent with family.)
- theoh 8y agoThat's just one, very plausible, possible back story. (https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/clogs_to_clogs_in_three_generations https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/clogs_to_clogs_in_three_gener...) But some wealth is effectively a windfall. Tim Harford's point is that we aren't inclined to think about opportunity cost. It doesn't, in fact, come naturally. A life of privilege has opportunity costs too: it can be really hard for someone "well born" to acquire certain competences. And an (elective?) nerd's opportunity cost is all those things that jocks enjoy. (A ridiculous example, sorry!)