I'm a little disheartened to see Pevear and Volokhonsky not mentioned. As an amateur in the field of translation, perhaps my understanding is weak, but, having

I'm a little disheartened to see Pevear and Volokhonsky not mentioned. As an amateur in the field of translation, perhaps my understanding is weak, but, having read multiple translations of several Dostoevsky books, I've always seen their work as head and shoulders above others'. I do find that each translation comes with its own insights and I'm glad to have read multiple, but I still think they deserve the recognition they've been receiving.