> From the article it seems that police is using it more closely to the first case, than to the second case, so the performance of this system might be good, so

> From the article it seems that police is using it more closely to the first case, than to the second case, so the performance of this system might be good, so really the article is non-story I will quote Bruce Schneier on CCTV cameras > But the question really isn't whether cameras reduce crime; the question is whether they're worth it. And given their cost (£500 m in the past 10 years), their limited effectiveness, the potential for abuse (spying on naked women in their own homes, sharing nude images, selling best-of videos, and even spying on national politicians) and their Orwellian effects on privacy and civil liberties, most of the time they're not. The funds spent on CCTV cameras would be far better spent on hiring experienced police officers. https://www.schneier.com/essays/archives/2008/06/cctv_doesnt_keep_us.html https://www.schneier.com/essays/archives/2008/06/cctv_doesnt... Just replace CCTV cameras with AI.