4 ms·
> Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. That's neither obvious nor true. Absence of evidence is more likely if there really is an absence of whatever
by aeorgnoieang 8y ago
> Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
That's neither obvious nor true. Absence of evidence is more likely if there really is an absence of whatever; thus it is in fact evidence of absence, if only weak evidence.