> ... and foobar2000 on my computer. > I of course could have done this myself, but it was a pain in the ass, and the 5 minutes it took for iTunes to finish it

> ... and foobar2000 on my computer. > I of course could have done this myself, but it was a pain in the ass, and the 5 minutes it took for iTunes to finish its job and close it was almost worth it. I hate to sound contrarian, but the author really needed to leverage foobar2000 better, because it can do all of that with the masstagger extension and its very simple macro language. Granted, that extension hasn't been included by default for a while, but it's highly popular for good reason, and the macro language is simple enough that it should be a cakewalk for any developer (if not the average person). Unless you actually require something that iTunes provides, foobar2000 + masstagger is a far more useful and efficient way to organize your music library.