3 ms·
I wonder if their attempt to force HTTPS everywhere (by shaming HTTP-only sites as insecure in Chrome) fits into this strategy. It would put net neutrality vio
by jjhbw 8y ago
I wonder if their attempt to force HTTPS everywhere (by shaming HTTP-only sites as insecure in Chrome) fits into this strategy.
It would put net neutrality violators like US ISPs out of the mass surveilla- ..eeeh advertising business, so I guess that is a good thing.
- Cursuviam 8y agoI feel this one is highly positive enough to give them leeway. There are many types of browsing data, my porn habits as an egregious example, that I would prefer be constrained to a minimum number of entities.
- jacksmith21006 8y agoThink driven to keep people safer and the same with Project Zero. A safer digital world and people will use more and Google then makes more money. My gripe with the broader industry is that Google is finding a lot more of the big vulnerabilities than their competitors. Should be a lot more balanced. I can not even think of one major one found by Apple. Yet Google has found so many of the really big ones. Today see an article they found additional.
- crummy 8y agoWhat exactly should Google do differently here, when they find bugs in other companies products?
- jacksmith21006 8y agoThe point is spending the money to find them. I personally believe MS should have done this years before Google.