4 ms·
Drones must be regulated because people are irresponsible. Sometimes I see photos taken from a drone hanging above the people. What if it falls down? Therefore
by codedokode 8y ago
Drones must be regulated because people are irresponsible. Sometimes I see photos taken from a drone hanging above the people. What if it falls down?
Therefore, drones need identification. There must be a number on it and there must be a law forbidding to operate a drone without number.
- jrumbut 8y agoI like trying to preserve anonymity and a lack of bureaucracy where possible but really registering a flying machine is not unduly onerous, assuming the cost (if any) and process is kept proportional to the size/value/potential for havoc of the device.
- _0ffh 8y ago"What if it falls down?" In Germany drones from 250g up must have a fireproof plaque with name and address of the owner. If it falls down, you'll be able to read it. No need for ID broadcasting. Or even IDs.
- djrogers 8y agoThis doesn’t at all address criminal behavior or use of drones though - if one is willing to commit a crime with a drone, surely one would be willing to extend that crime by removing the nameplate?
- _0ffh 8y agoIf one is willing to commit a crime with a drone, surely one would be willing to extend that crime by disabling or falsifying the ID broadcast?
- codedokode 8y agoBut this could help against reckless and irresponsible people.
- syshum 8y ago>Drones must be regulated because people are irresponsible So does this apply to everything a person can be "irresponsible" with? I can be "irresponsible" with my hammer do I need hammer regulation? How far do you want to go into Authoritarianism?
- jamespo 8y agoah the slippery slope
- codedokode 8y agoIf your hammer can fly then probably yes. Are you against license plates on cars too?
- jamiethompson 8y agoIt can if they throw it
- syshum 8y agoYes actually. I do not believe I should be required by law to display a Personally identifiable ID number that can be used to record my movements either by government or individuals. I value personal liberty and privacy over any perceived and hyped "safety" justifications used to violate that liberty and privacy, for which the advertised safety benefits/need hardly ever materialize