3 ms·
Gary Taubes has his own biases and problems: https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/gary-taubes-and-the-case-against-sugar/ https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/gary-taub
by sp3000 8y ago
Gary Taubes has his own biases and problems: https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/gary-taubes-and-the-case-against-sugar/ https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/gary-taubes-and-the-case-ag...
In fact, the study he proposed to test his hypothesis failed: https://community.fitbit.com/t5/Manage-Weight/NuSI-study-backfires-on-Gary-Taubes-Carb-Insulin-obesity-link-debunked/td-p/1364736 https://community.fitbit.com/t5/Manage-Weight/NuSI-study-bac...
That's not to say Taubes has not written a lot of good and important things, but it is an example of someone who is in so deep that they are missing the forest for the trees. Carbs are obviously not the devil, it's just that the overabundance of cheap, processed carbs have made the diseases of abundance commonplace.
- toasterlovin 8y agoThat’s all fine and we’ll, but I’m not mentioning Taubes for his carbs hypothesis (btw, he goes to great pains in Good Calories, Bad Calories to make sure the reader understands that his hypothesis could be wrong because it is also lacking the necessary type of study to demonstrate it’s effectiveness). I’m linking to him because he has important stuff to say about the limits of epidemiology, in general, and the terrible state of nutrition science, more specifically.