11 ms·
I didn't understand this example... because it seemed like blatant cheating... The prisoners are risking death... The rules are clear... only 50 boxes per pri
by flyGuyOnTheSly 8y ago
I didn't understand this example... because it seemed like blatant cheating...
The prisoners are risking death...
The rules are clear... only 50 boxes per prisoner...
Why would somebody take the risk of opening 100 boxes?
I suppose it's an interesting thought experiment...
- edanm 8y agoIt's a different riddle, not a different solution to the riddle. It's asked differently: given the same setup, except you have one extra person who's the leader, and he's allowed to go in and look at all the boxes, then make one change.