3 ms·
Not a joke :). The pricing is actually cheaper than "bare" geolocation APIs, which don't do the blocking-part. Have a look at https://ipstack.com/product https:
by niko001 8y ago
Not a joke :). The pricing is actually cheaper than "bare" geolocation APIs, which don't do the blocking-part. Have a look at https://ipstack.com/product https://ipstack.com/product for example.
If you get a quote from an experienced data protection lawyer for GDPR compliance, this will be an order of magnitude cheaper in the long run. There's a real risk of getting sued / getting cease and desist letters from predatory law firms who aim to collect fees for small mistakes in your privacy policy.
- threeseed 8y ago> There's a real risk of getting sued / getting cease and desist letters from predatory law firms who aim to collect fees for small mistakes in your privacy policy No there isn't. When the GPDR fines are 2% of revenue there isn't the incentive for lawyers to go after businesses earning less than a million a year in revenue.
- peterhunt 8y agoor 10m euro, whichever is higher
- niko001 8y agoYou're mixing up the member states' enforcement (4% of worldwide turnover or €20 million, whichever is higher) and civil suits. There are law firms that send out thousands of cease and desist letters (which is a civil action) based on automated searches for mistakes. It absolutely makes economic sense for lawyers to pursue out-of-court settlements from businesses if it's mostly automated.
- GordonS 8y agoThis is just nonsense. I don't see how the GDPR possibly allows civil actions for infractions, doubly so for countries outside the EU.