3 ms·
I think there is value in that. I would still be sure to hash it a second time on the server. My guess is that this isn't popular because of the added client s
by tada-ssola 8y ago
I think there is value in that. I would still be sure to hash it a second time on the server.
My guess is that this isn't popular because of the added client side complexity.
I'm also curious if anyone has considered or implemented this idea.
- tada-ssola 8y agoAh answered elsewhere, if the client sends the hash and you log the hash then you still have a problem. The user should change passwords. Although I think this still improves the situation if the password is reused. I.E. I can't use the logged hashed password on other sites.