4 ms·
The major fear that comes up with these is: what if the missile blows up while still in earth? How are these risks managed?
by petra 9y ago
The major fear that comes up with these is: what if the missile blows up while still in earth? How are these risks managed?
- philipkglass 9y agoThe Kilopower reactor presents far lower radiological risks than RTGs in the event of complete disassembly within Earth's environment. Pu-238 has a specific activity of 634 billion Bq/g, nearly 8 million times that of the Kilopower reactor's U-235 fuel (80 thousand Bq/g). Once the reactor attains criticality, it produces fission products that have even higher specific activity than Pu-238. But the reactor can remain safely inactive until the risky launch phase is over. There is no way to inactivate the decay of Pu-238 for the launch phase. The risks of RTG launch are handled by using designs with high mechanical/thermal robustness to encapsulate the plutonium ceramic. I think that they were already safe enough. But the Kilopower reactor is inherently low-radiotoxicity before criticality, which makes it safer yet during the launch phase.
- mcguire 9y agoPresumably, the same way Pu-238 RTGs manage the risks. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioisotope_thermoelectric_generator#Safety https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioisotope_thermoelectric_ge...
- MertsA 9y agoTo simplify the other more detailed response, It's just Uranium at that point. Even highly enriched Uranium isn't that radioactive by itself, it's once you start operating the reactor that it starts generating highly radioactive waste. The new fuel rods going into it are totally safe from a radioactivity perspective. Here's a picture of a man holding a fuel rod bundle with nothing more than gloves on. http://nuclearstreet.com/images/img/dw037.jpg http://nuclearstreet.com/images/img/dw037.jpg
- jessaustin 9y agoOne can't help but notice from his shirt and his hair that the picture was taken in the 1970s. Lots of awful practices still existed then; who's to say this isn't a picture of that?
- philipkglass 9y agoHere's a photo series from 2005 at a Swedish nuclear fuel facility showing how uranium turns into fuel pellets and fuel rod bundles: https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/multimedia/photoessays/training-nuclear-watchdogs-0 https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/multimedia/photoessays/train... At all stages the material can be handled with no more protection than gloves. It is roughly as dangerous as handling lead fishing weights until the fuel actually attains criticality.
- IdeaHamstir 9y agoIt still produces a fair bit of alpha, so avoid particulate ingestion.
- MertsA 9y agoI don't know why people downvoted this, it's entirely correct. Although I guess the larger concern than the radiation would be the heavy metal poisoning but in any case it's still fine, just treat it like you would any other heavy metal.
- perl4ever 9y agoThe Soviets launched over 30 satellites with nuclear reactors in the past. The US also launched one. Most of them are still in orbit and I only know of one that scattered nuclear waste all over Canada. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kosmos_954 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kosmos_954 and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US-A https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US-A