Thank you for this comment; it has been an eye-opener for me. I always eyeballed those statistic and assumed 0.95 is good; now I've realized that it's not speci

Thank you for this comment; it has been an eye-opener for me. I always eyeballed those statistic and assumed 0.95 is good; now I've realized that it's not specificity, but (100%-specificity) that matters.