6 ms·
When Google Hates Your Name: Why We Renamed Our Startup
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- AlexMuir 16y agoIt must be a tough call whether to battle on with a four/five letter miss-spell, or change to something longer. Obviously locately is much better though.
- greg_holsclaw 16y agoIt is tough acquiring a short (under 8 letter) meaningful domain name now. I am curious to know how much it cost just to buy that domain. Sometimes you can make a nonsensical name stick with enough effort/branding: see zillow.com, it is all in the sub title.
- iuyhgtfvgbhjn 16y agoSupposedly the 'internet generation' are now savy enough to know this. If you launch a site called "sport.com" or "music.com" young people know that however hip and trendy your graphics you must be a bank/$Bn corp to own that name. So to appeal to 'yoof' you have to have a "the only address we could get" type meaningless name ( even if you are a $Bn corp!)
- danilocampos 16y agoSounds like the author had some human-centric reasons for changing the name of the business. It's worth noting that Google can be taught to like invented names in a pretty short amount of time, though. Three of my four iPhone projects shipped with invented words for names (Oddage, Tallymander, Globejot). Even after the sites were live and indexed, Google would do its "did you mean..." or worse, showing results for the word it thought I meant by default. So, searching for Tallymander, for example, would give you "Showing results for Sallymander" for the first two results. With any amount of press or other web conversation that generates inbound links, though, this problem ends up taking care of itself. About a week after launch, Google recognized each word as legitimate and I enjoyed top ranking.
- MartinCron 16y agoThanks for sharing this experience, the Cadio->Cardio thing was scaring the heck out of me.
- jaf656s 16y agoThis is determined probabilistically, so as you get more coverage (and links) the term occurs more often on the web, thus making it less likely that it was a misspelling. I imagine link text might be given more weight over regular text, but I am not sure. Anyone know for sure?
- richardhenry 16y agoI found this pretty quickly with Cursebird.
- danilocampos 16y agoDid you mean custard? Showing results for custard. Click here to see results for cursebird. Ah, Google.
- richardhenry 16y agoI assume you're joking? If not, let me know. Here's what myself and most people see: http://cl.ly/2SzP http://cl.ly/2SzP Interestingly, if you search for "cussbird" it will correct you to "cursebird": http://cl.ly/2TPX http://cl.ly/2TPX I'm not logged in, and people in the U.S. see the same results.
- matrix 16y agoI feel the blame is very much misplaced; Google had nothing to do with the viability of "Cadio" name. It was inevitable that people would confuse it with "Cardio", whether Google auto-suggested it or not. That said, I do sympathy for the difficulty in finding short, easily spelled domain names. It's been downright ridiculous trying to find good names in recent years.
- bryanh 16y agoI spend weeks and weeks deciding on a name. So far I've had Rankiac and BitBuffet, both of which were almost 80% completed before I ever had the domain. EveryMentor wasn't available and I had to WAIT for the domain to expire for about 20ish days (it was pending deletion).
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- fghjhgbvf 16y agoAlso ask yourself: Can spell it out to somebdy over the phone without resorting to phonetic alphabet? Do you use numbers in the name - worse do you use them to be cute ? Do you mix words that sound like letters eg. "see" and "c" in the name ? Does the name contain a joke/pun/double meaning that only makes sense written down or read outloud?
- jacquesm 16y ago> fghjhgbvf I rest my case ;) Good advice otherwise though, another one is make sure that the people in the major markets can pronounce the word in an unambiguous way.
- quanticle 16y agoI don't know, I like fhqwhgads more (http://www.homestarrunner.com/fhqwhgads.html http://www.homestarrunner.com/fhqwhgads.html).
- iaskwhy 16y agoI actually thought the problem was with masschallenge.org before reading the article. Added the idea to my domain buying checklist.
- quizbiz 16y agoI am doing SEO consulting for a company called South-Pak that makes custom travel and road cases. Obviously, the business owners don't want to change the name and obviously Google thinks it's a misspelling of South Park (if you query South-Pak, you must then click on the link to confirm that you are looking for results for South-Pak. Combatting the fact that many are searching for the name of the company and getting frustrated, I'm working hard to associate South-Pak with the word cases. As a result of the anchor text, et al, when one types in South-Pak you should, South-Pak Cases should be one of the options generated by Google Instant. As long as you have the .com domain though, Google can't hurt you much. Fundamentally, you want to have the .com domain, have a name that is difficult to misspell and easy to explain on the phone. If people that don't know about your name and they are looking for you, they should be able to find you on Google. That's what Google is for. If that's not the case, it's probably you, not Google.
- jacquesm 16y ago> easy to explain on the phone So many people forget about that one, it's really important. Of course all the rest is also important, but one of the major drivers of viral traffic is still people telling other people about your product, in person or on the telephone.
- spokey 16y agoOut of curiosity, is there another way to pronounce "cadio" other than cad-e-o?
- pchristensen 16y agocade-e-o (sounds like radio) cod-e-o (sounds like audio)
- acabal 16y agoKAY-dee-oh, kah-DEE-oh, KAH-dee-oh, kaa-DIE-oh...
- DotSauce 16y agoWhy do these articles never mention the aftermarket? It's like businesses refuse to acknowledge that good domains are available to purchase. Sedo? Afternic? BuyDomains? Auctions? Personal portfolios? Wake up! This is where the real gems are. Domain finder tools are dead. They don't work.
- chc 16y agoIt's like bootstrapped businesses don't want to pay $10000 for a marginally better name.
- DotSauce 16y agohttp://auctions.godaddy.com http://auctions.godaddy.com - $5 bargain bin http://sedo.com http://sedo.com - "Make an offer" on thousands of keyword names http://freshdrop.net http://freshdrop.net - Filter and sort pretty much every marketplace. http://BrandStack.com http://BrandStack.com
- chc 16y agoYes, you can get cheap domain names, but they'll usually be worse that whatever nonsense you think up. Look at those links you just posted. Anything near the going price of a domain name is going to be absolute crap. Here's the first page of the Godaddy auctions page: formenti.tv, live960.tv, news18.tv, kamerali-sohbet.info, jeong-vs-jpmorganchase.com, watchmadmenonline.info, randy-orton.org, tvlima.tv, youngshemales.info, 3wolves.us, specialq.mobi, b2bmarketplace.us, straightdaddies.com, epiphonesheraton.com, schooltools.tv The only names that look remotely useful for any conceivable purpose (youngshemales, b2bmarketplace and schooltools) are all in spammy-looking TLDs.
- drewvolpe 16y agoWe bought Locately.com. I don't know if we're not creative enough, but it was much better than anything we were able to come up with which wasn't registered. And having a better name is definitely worth the small amount of money we paid for it.
- CWIZO 16y agoTo me, Cadio is much better than Locately (I brake my tongue trying to pronounce it). Easier to remember, spell and pronounce. English is not my native language so that might be the reason why I think that.
- wheaties 16y agoWhen I read your name the first time I read "locality" and then I realized it was something different. You might run into yet another human centric reason for not liking your name.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- jay_kyburz 16y agoExactly what I came to say. Why not just call your service "Location Analytics" and take a longer domain if you have to. I think people place way to much value on a snazzy short domains. Customers are probably searching for you anyhow. Why not own your primary search term.
- charlief 16y agoI agree, also on the pronunciation front, I am assuming: Low-kate-LEE Try saying that 10 times fast, the ending in the last two syllables make it a bit of a tongue twister. What about other possibilities that seem like often-occurring interpretations? Low-Kate-{soft eh}-LEE Low-CAT-{soft eh}-LY
- losvedir 16y agoInteresting. It jumps out at me as low-KATE-lee, growing up speaking California English. (If by caps you're indicating putting the emphasis on that syllable.)
- seldo 16y agoWhile much of this is good advice, the "name that says what you do" is tricky. Product names should say what they do, but companies sometimes find it more useful to remain vague. Consider: Yahoo, Google, eBay, Amazon. None of these words had, when invented, any associations in the public mind. This allows those companies to grow and change their brands and their focus. Imagine if Amazon had been called "Bookery". Or if Google were called "Searchio". Great names for what those companies started doing, completely misleading now -- especially in Amazon's case.
- ig1 16y agoOne of the biggest mobile phone retailers in the UK is called "Carphone Warehouse" - people don't think twice about the name. People treat the name as a brand rather than a literal interpretation of the words that make up the brand.
- jcurbo 16y agoWell, "amazon" is from Greek mythology and wasn't really invented recently, but the rest of your point still stands.
- agravier 16y agoIt was possibly mostly associated with the river in people's mind at launch time. Amazon is a smart name, exotic rivers and books go well together.
- 16y ago
- brc 16y agoI made all these mistakes as well, but continue to soldier on with my original name. Google has grudgingly accepted it and the mis-directed traffic is quite minimal now. One thing the author didn't mention was that when you're getting a lot of mispell traffic, it plays havoc with your traffic stats, and it gets very hard to move the needle testing different content because you might have 60-70% of your traffic in the early days boucing immediately.
- NationalHQ 16y agoYour new name is another DNS casualty
- philfreo 16y agoDomize (https://domize.com/ https://domize.com/) and Wordoid (http://wordoid.com/ http://wordoid.com/) both seem really useful
- maguay 16y agoMy site Techinch.com came up first for "techinch" with no problems on Google until they switched to instant search. Now it says "Showing results for techniche. Search instead for techinch" Grrrr So would you recomend sticking it out, or trying for a new name? Just a small blog right now, but I definately want it to grow...
- drewvolpe 16y agoIf you like your name then I wouldn't switch. Techniche is not that common a search term and as you start to get more traffic and mentions, you should be able to overcome it quickly. In our case, "cardio" is a very common search term. Also, we didn't like our name for the other reasons given (hard to pronounce, doesn't say what we do, not memorable).
- maguay 16y agoThanks for the encouragement. Yes, I like it, and think I'll stick with it. I can defiantly see why your former name could have problems in search, and it turns out that Techniche is a tech conference in India this year ... who knew? So hey, should work itself out over time.
- jasonkester 16y agoAs to the Pronounceable, Spellable, Memorable bit... That can't be emphasized enough. Actually, I bet you can find me personally emphasizing it a half dozen times if you do a search here. But I don't buy the Google part. I personally run a little startup that had no trouble ranking for its own name, despite the fact that the first Google search we ever did for the name resulted in "Did you mean Twiddle?" That only lasted a few months. Now we've crowded that poor word completely off the results for our name, and we've even kicked it out of the top slot when searching for "twiddle". I won't be surprised when Google starts coming back with "Showing results for Twiddla. Search instead for Twiddle" for that search. It just takes a bit of time and exposure.
- cammil 16y agoA couple of other factors that we considered: 1. The spelling should be obvious from the pronunciation. 2. Should have as few syllables as possible. Two is great if you can find one.
- Nate75Sanders 16y agoI'll make no comments about the SEO viability of the name, but I find these ending-in-"ly" names (I've seen a few of them recently) atrocious. An "ly" is one of the strongest markers in the English language for a part of speech: an adverb. When you make an adverb out of something that shouldn't be, you get something that sounds like it was uttered by a 3-year-old.
- daychilde 16y agoI feel agreely with you.
- chopsueyar 16y agoGood thing you realized this in the beginning.