3 ms·
> it's really hard to see how they can be stopped. I don't think they can "be stopped" - at least not by competitors, as long as they maintain their overall st
by LyndsySimon 9y ago
> it's really hard to see how they can be stopped.
I don't think they can "be stopped" - at least not by competitors, as long as they maintain their overall strategy of expanding their marketshare by cutting margins below what their competitors can bear.
In my opinion, this is the way it should be. If a monopoly exists that is more efficient than a competitor can be, then it deserves to exist and its existence benefits consumers. On the other hand, if a monopoly becomes abusive then it will be destroyed very quickly by others who will be more than happy to undercut them.
Amazon (and all monopolies) will fail much more quickly than might be apparent at first glance if they abuse their position. "Bigger" does not always mean "stronger".
- mistermann 9y ago> On the other hand, if a monopoly becomes abusive then it will be destroyed very quickly by others who will be more than happy to undercut them. > Amazon (and all monopolies) will fail much more quickly than might be apparent at first glance if they abuse their position. Are these universal truths, with no possible exceptions in the past of future? > "Bigger" does not always mean "stronger". Crossing the street without looking both directions does not always result in being injured or killed, but it often does.