> It seems much more simple to assume some system must simply exist without necessity of creation. You are spot on. This system must exist in-itself. That is,

> It seems much more simple to assume some system must simply exist without necessity of creation. You are spot on. This system must exist in-itself. That is, it must be so simple that its existence cannot be separated from its nature (to use Aristotelean terms). In other words, I AM WHO AM.