>The only guys that I see holding this back are 35+ and particularly 45+. Who, obviously, do have the wealth to move crypto to higher valuation. So a bunch of

>The only guys that I see holding this back are 35+ and particularly 45+. Who, obviously, do have the wealth to move crypto to higher valuation. So a bunch of young people have bought into a new currency and/or store of value and you're complaining that the older crowd isn't further propping up that market? Why would I move my investments in productive assets like stocks, real estate and other things into Bitcoin? I don't have it in gold, I don't have it in established currencies, why would I want Bitcoin as an asset? I still haven't seen a good argument for why Bitcoin's features should warrant what is, in the growth scenarios of its proponents, probably the biggest wealth transfer in the history of our civilization. Or any argument for that matter really.