To make it more clear: I'm not trying to defend anyone in a case I know nothing about, but if there is further evidence that cannot be made public, a non-exposi

To make it more clear: I'm not trying to defend anyone in a case I know nothing about, but if there is further evidence that cannot be made public, a non-exposing description of that evidence must be the central piece of the article, not some screenshot that only stirs emotion because someone used the word "stalker". With that as the focal point, the article makes it all seem like a baseless witchhunt and that can only be harmful to the cause.