3 ms·

Am I the only one who completely fails to see the smoking gun in that screenshot?

• usrusr 9y ago
  To make it more clear: I'm not trying to defend anyone in a case I know nothing about, but if there is further evidence that cannot be made public, a non-exposing description of that evidence must be the central piece of the article, not some screenshot that only stirs emotion because someone used the word "stalker". With that as the focal point, the article makes it all seem like a baseless witchhunt and that can only be harmful to the cause.
• deleted 9y ago
  [deleted]
• jdormit 9y ago
  You are not. To me it comes off like a misguided attempt to impress someone, not an admission of actual wrongdoing. The guy comes off as a creepy asshole for sure, but it's basically just bragging. But really, given everything going on with Facebook, why would an employee ever think this was a good idea? That's what is really beyond me.
• otterley 9y ago
  The complete conversation was not included, to protect the identity of the complainant.