4 ms·
It's the only argument that makes sense for disparate population sizes. The US and UK (and less so Germany, France, Israel and Japan) produce a sizable majorit
by deaddodo 9y ago
It's the only argument that makes sense for disparate population sizes.
The US and UK (and less so Germany, France, Israel and Japan) produce a sizable majority of software products, especially at an enterprise level. At a per capita level, that gap is even larger with China; and countries like Sweden and Norway become top players.
- kodablah 9y ago> It's the only argument that makes sense for disparate population sizes. Or you accept that a comparison simply can't be made and don't make the argument in the first place.
- deaddodo 9y agoIncorrect.
- traek 9y agoIt’s a meaningless comparison, the median Swedish/Norwegian citizen is far more educated, wealthy, and capable of producing software than the median Chinese citizen. China’s per capita software production is dragged down by its massive rural population, many of whom have never even owned a computer other than a smartphone. If you don’t account for that, then obviously wealthier/more urbanized countries will have higher per capita production.
- JoeAltmaier 9y agoChina is 55% urban. Its had a massive urban influx, and in fact the largest growth area in population is urban. However 1 in 5 are 'migrant workers' with no fixed address. I'd guess they are the least educated demographic.