3 ms·
> So the question really becomes: kill one man, or kill one man and ruin his family's chance at a decent life. In the article they said that conservatives favo
by Periodic 16y ago
> So the question really becomes: kill one man, or kill one man and ruin his family's chance at a decent life.
In the article they said that conservatives favored killing the "black" man while liberals favored killing the "white" man. It isn't as clear as the background simply providing more data. The internal stereotype and moral values of the subject are also influencing it. It would be a terrible study if they had just lumped everyone into one big pool. It became interesting when they gathered other information about the subjects and then found correlations with their behavior.
Thus, it really isn't about what the common stereotypes are, but rather how two groups can perceive the same situation differently enough to make different decisions.
- jmatthews 16y agoThere's a flaw in the entire data set. I would "kill whitey" or the "blackman" to save the "victim group" but I would know that it was morally wrong. It doesn't test morality, it tests your response to the situation. Thus my moral code is absolute, and I willing act immorally for a utilitarian outcome.