You've made such an odd assertion though, I thought I was misreading you. Please forgive my confusion. You seem to be saying that applying grammar rules to li

You've made such an odd assertion though, I thought I was misreading you. Please forgive my confusion. You seem to be saying that applying grammar rules to literal word definitions should provide 100% of the information conveyed in a conversation. The phrase "toxic masculinity" is only a small piece of information in related conversations between people. There's context, body language, tone, emotional states, memory of past conversations, number of participants, etc that provides all the meaning to the conversation. Are you not confronting the issue in terms of real human communications especially regarding kids and choosing only to discuss word meanings? That's not very helpful. :shrug: