I wasn't suggesting the article needed to be more technical in nature or lacked details but rather pointing out that the improper use of a grammatic article dem

I wasn't suggesting the article needed to be more technical in nature or lacked details but rather pointing out that the improper use of a grammatic article demonstrated a lack of editorial oversight by a technical resource. In other words, the authors are speaking with authority about something they demonstrated ignorance of by improper use of an article and they went out of their way to use language that would lead a non-technical reader to conclude the failure that occurred was a result of 60 year old code when in reality it was due to 18 month old hardware.