3 ms·
I think the bigger take away for me is that what constitutes low level has evolved over time. I still think C is low level because you have to manage your own m
by snarf21 9y ago
I think the bigger take away for me is that what constitutes low level has evolved over time. I still think C is low level because you have to manage your own memory and can play tricks with pointers and memory that other languages protect you from. Meaning that low level takes off a lot of the training wheels. The compiler still does what it can and optimizes things but you have a far greater ability to shoot yourself in the foot than in some other language. The arguments about what a "real" low level in these comments seem mostly pedantic.
- munificent 9y ago> I think the bigger take away for me is that what constitutes low level has evolved over time. Yeah, this is a good insight. The height of the overall stack has grown. The lowest low level is lower than it was in the 60s and the highest high level is higher. So we need more terms to cover that wider continuum.