3 ms·
Forgive me for this sort of post, but am I the only one that felt like this article ended without a conclusion? Did I miss something like a second page, or did
by sukuriant 16y ago
Forgive me for this sort of post, but am I the only one that felt like this article ended without a conclusion? Did I miss something like a second page, or did this really end on 'and Google responded to the charges by missing JavaOne' when the article was on Oracle's OSS stance?
- abp 16y agoHm, the claims against Google Android was fuel on a little fire. Before that it was just like "oh no Oracle is killing Java". After that it was "oh no Oracle is killing Java and sueing everything OSS". :)
- Someone 16y agoI think it is written in a style of 'most important info at the top'. That makes the story fizzle out. In summary: Paragraph one points to a blog post <http://blogs.oracle.com/henrik/2010/09/oracle_and_openjdk.html> http://blogs.oracle.com/henrik/2010/09/oracle_and_openjdk.ht...; that describes that Oracle will continue with Java 'business as usual'. (aside: I think HN should link to that blog directly). Paragraph two gives a tiny bit more info. Paragraph three give some background info that most HN readers probably already know. For me, the main open question is whether we should be happy or sad that Oracle promises to "work with the OpenJDK code base and the OpenJDK community like Sun did"?
- abp 16y ago(aside: I think HN should link to that blog directly) http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1697347 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1697347