> This does not apply to the majority of students going to college. Why should a tiny fraction of students be able to drag down the reputation of a college beca

> This does not apply to the majority of students going to college. Why should a tiny fraction of students be able to drag down the reputation of a college because they do not want to do the work that they signed up to do, paid tuition to be taught how to do, and signed a contract saying that they would honestly complete to the best of their abilities? Why should colleges penalize against possible future job interview fraud? Pre-crime, anyone? > It is a matter for colleges to worry about because they are in the business of bestowing credentials backed up by the colleges reputation for doing a good job educating their students. If too many students have a degree from a college but they do not actually know anything, then degrees in general from that college become devalued and it cheats the students who put in all the work legitimately! Good, the sooner we bury the whole rotten, overpriced system, the sooner we can come up with a better alternative. > Cheating is not free, it has a real cost to it as companies have to implement additional testing and applicants have to spend their time (which always has a monetary trade off) going through screening that is redundant to the credentials they already have. Neither is spending $200k on tuition!