3 ms·
there isnt a specific one but here is an example: https://www.holtorfmed.com/cdc-doesnt-want-know-lyme/ https://www.holtorfmed.com/cdc-doesnt-want-know-lyme/
by jaequery 8y ago
there isnt a specific one but here is an example:
https://www.holtorfmed.com/cdc-doesnt-want-know-lyme/ https://www.holtorfmed.com/cdc-doesnt-want-know-lyme/
- rainbowmverse 8y agoThis whole site screams "obnoxious quack." I'm surprised I don't see an eBook pitch. I don't know who this doctor is or why he's somehow more credible than the CDC.
- acdha 8y agoThat’s a pretty weak argument and it’s on a site devoted to getting you to sign up with a “Lyme Literate MD”, which by strange coincidence includes the guy writing the page. I’m more convinced that there’s a conflict of interest there than anything else. AFAICT, the CDC position is the usual conservative scientific process: “chronic Lyme” isn’t a recognized diagnosis, the proposed treatments aren’t clinically proven, and there are significant risks: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/66/wr/mm6623a3.htm https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/66/wr/mm6623a3.htm