>You have no right to use AWS, so this is not censorship in the legal sense. I guess you meant "duty" instead of "right"; and respecting the sovereignty of oth

>You have no right to use AWS, so this is not censorship in the legal sense. I guess you meant "duty" instead of "right"; and respecting the sovereignty of other nations means they can block any site they like or even internet itself if they desire, but it doesn't mean we have to allow local companies to comply with laws from those countries. >As you note, private companies are typically free to do as they please in free countries...that's kinda the point. That's not the point at all; lets put it this way, companies are NOT free to poison the water we drink or even poison the water of other countries drink just because their governments tell them to do so.