6 ms·
The part where the person thinks they have some right to tell others what to do with their properly-zoned property while simultaneously refusing to pay for that
by traytonwhite 8y ago
The part where the person thinks they have some right to tell others what to do with their properly-zoned property while simultaneously refusing to pay for that right?
- zapita 8y agoWoah. Someone said "all homeowners benefit from increased density in their neighborhood". Tom replied that as a homeowner he didn't feel he benefited from increased density, and explained why. He didn't tell anyone what to do. What are you so upset about?
- jacobolus 8y ago* *
- dragonwriter 8y ago> All homeowners benefit when the teachers, police officers, nurses, librarians, postal workers, garbage collectors, mechanics, plumbers, construction workers, retail clerks, gym trainers, restaurant servers, hairdressers, taxi drivers, artists, etc. etc. etc. can afford to live somewhere within a reasonable commute distance. No, they don't. All homeowners don't have the same utility function. Not living near people of different socio-economic strata is a very important factor in some people's utility function. > When the only people who can afford to live within 40 miles are senior software engineers, surgeons, hedge fund quants, corporate executives, and large landowners, the whole community becomes a fake and lifeless place. The features you see as “fake and lifeless” are what many people actively desire and seek out. Aesthetics are highly subjective.
- jacobolus 8y agoEdit: nevermind, this is a stupid conversation. I would delete it if I could.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- la6470 8y agoUnderstand your pain but it’s the market that decides at the end .