3 ms·
"again against original idea of prop 13 to just help elderly with living in their places when retired" But if that isn't the case, then wouldn't a home have to
by s73v3r_ 9y ago
"again against original idea of prop 13 to just help elderly with living in their places when retired"
But if that isn't the case, then wouldn't a home have to be sold to cover the tax increase? So you couldn't keep a home in the family, either.
- pound 9y agoIs it a declared right to keep a home in the family? Also why new homeowners not inheriting it are supposed to be paying property taxes in full?
- pound 9y agoAlso in this case if you want to help someone to keep property they cannot afford then maybe tax assessment reduction should be based on new owner's income level and not on a year deceased relatives bought place
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- s73v3r_ 9y agoIf we're against someone being priced out of their home by taxes, wouldn't we also be against homes being priced out of families by taxes too?
- kelnos 9y agoWhy? I'm totally fine with a measure that helps keep fixed-income residents in their homes when property taxes would otherwise eat them alive. I see no reason why we need to keep that property tax burden affordable when that resident passes away and the property goes to their heirs, who presumably already live somewhere else, paying taxes they can afford. If they can't cover the newly-assessed property tax on their relative's residence, then they should sell it and stay where they are.