3 ms·
He could have taken on outsourcing as a side-project, outsourced a major portion of his job successfully, demonstrated it to higher ups transparently, and lande
by RIMR 9y ago
He could have taken on outsourcing as a side-project, outsourced a major portion of his job successfully, demonstrated it to higher ups transparently, and landed a better role as an outsourcing specialist.
Instead, he secretly outsourced his entire job and pretended to actually do the work himself so he could get paid to do nothing.
The company fired him because he didn't operate in a way that was good for the company, only in a way that benefited him personally.
People like him don't belong in management, they belong in jobs that don't require any trust, because they aren't trustworthy people.
- eecsninja 9y agoYou're right, actually. He hasn't proved trustworthy, but that's because he leaked confidential company materials. I don't get why this is being brought up as a matter of cheating rather than leaking, which is the big elephant in the room. Still shows a lack of ethics though.
- madeofpalk 9y agoPeople don’t like it when you’re dishonest. You get in trouble for that. Whether you steal money, pay someone for a university exam or wrongfully outsource your job, there will be consequences.