4 ms·
I thought it was 100% objective, straight across. I don't see any barbs or negativity toward Amazon whatsoever, just the facts about that situation and an hones
by insensible 8y ago
I thought it was 100% objective, straight across. I don't see any barbs or negativity toward Amazon whatsoever, just the facts about that situation and an honest discussion of the facts looking forward.
- s73v3r_ 8y agoI feel the phrasing of the title (the word "threatens", using the phrase "censorship circumvention", not mentioning that they're doing all that stuff without Amazon's consent) is definitely aimed at generating negative feeling toward Amazon.