3 ms·
No, the solution is to solve the technical problem of leaking metadata during the TLS handshake. Should it also be unlawful to refuse service to someone who pr
by jpk 8y ago
No, the solution is to solve the technical problem of leaking metadata during the TLS handshake.
Should it also be unlawful to refuse service to someone who pretends to be you when they resell your widgets to the mob because they fear retaliation if the mob isn't happy with the goods?
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- jpk 8y agoRe: Your deleted The fact that in Signal's case, the client and the server are fully aware of who each other are is immaterial (thus not part of the analogy). What the analogy demonstrates is that there exists a potentially-retaliatory party that sees the server identify itself as someone else. That someone else (in this case, the cloud provider) has the right to protest the use of their identity in a way that makes it a target for the retaliatory party. Have a great day.