> > When you blame a poor person for not getting a better job, you accept that while their job is necessary, whoever does it should be poor. > But is that the

> > When you blame a poor person for not getting a better job, you accept that while their job is necessary, whoever does it should be poor. > But is that the case? Yes. > Maybe they accept lower wages because it is the job they want. Did you read the quote? It is about what other people say to the worker. I feel like you did not read my comment, because your next sentence is > Maybe there are too many people who want to do the job. My whole post addressed that from beginning to end. Sometimes I have no words when I read replies to my comments. It feels... so futile to try to have a reasonable discussion when people completely ignore anything I say (write). . I already accepted that other people may feel differently when I inserted: > (that I like, obviously other people can come up with other options including "everything is fine as it is) because one thing is definitely true: This is not a law of nature. You can have a society where every Sunday a baby is thrown into a volcano (reference to somewhat similar recent headline from a finding in Peru, only 550 years or so ago, of children with their hearts cut out). The universe could not care less. It is completely up to what you/we want. You can certainly have a society like the current US of A, the richest country on the planet - in both space as well as time, simultaneously having 3rd world conditions for a sizable part of the population: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/dec/15/america-extreme-poverty-un-special-rapporteur https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/dec/15/america-extr...