4 ms·
Ok WHY then, has nobody tried said better way. Why won't anyone invest in it? The point I'm trying to make is that it's unproven. Maybe you're willing to pay a
by banachtarski 8y ago
Ok WHY then, has nobody tried said better way. Why won't anyone invest in it? The point I'm trying to make is that it's unproven. Maybe you're willing to pay a small amount (and what amount is that exactly). What about the rest of the world?
I think people "want" there to be an easy solution to this and are just pointing out problems without considering whether such a solution even exists.
- zero_intp 8y agosignal?
- banachtarski 8y agoWhat about it? They are funded by non-profit. Unless you're suggesting you're going to get anything near the feature set of current for-profit social networks. No major common features = no adoption by the general public. I'm talking face filters, gifs, emojis, stickers, videos, reactions, and the list goes on.
- icebraining 8y agoWhatsapp doesn't have many of those, yet they have 1.5 billion users. In fact, I think Signal has more of that stuff; there's no Gif Search in WA: https://signal.org/blog/signal-and-giphy-update/ https://signal.org/blog/signal-and-giphy-update/
- banachtarski 8y agoYes because they were a "free" messaging service that could supplant expensive SMS carriers. They are different products at the end of the day, and a messaging service was acquired by a social network. Anyone can get tons of users selling a product at a loss. This is the standard startup story. Why don't you approach an investor yourself and just start it.