It was nice to see that someone could test these with real-world usage, but I was disappointed by the quality of the results. I didn't see mention of the numbe

It was nice to see that someone could test these with real-world usage, but I was disappointed by the quality of the results. I didn't see mention of the number of runs performed on each instance or the standard deviation of the results. The article made it sound like they only ran it once on each instance, which means there are many factors that could have affected the results such as disk caching, other processes, or high load. As one of my physics professors uses to say (paraphrased): A measurement is meaningless without an estimate of the error (+/- 0 meaning).