3 ms·
Some is probably due the codec VP8 vs h264, but they are not wildly different in efficiency. WebRTC doesn't use VP9 or H.265 yet. I view the higher bandwidth us
by mgamache 8y ago
Some is probably due the codec VP8 vs h264, but they are not wildly different in efficiency. WebRTC doesn't use VP9 or H.265 yet. I view the higher bandwidth used as an attempt to maximize quality at every bandwidth they just didn't set a ceiling on the encoding frame size. It pushes the total quality number higher on the chart they've published.
- pishpash 8y agoAs a practical matter it isn't very, well, practical to have to change every codec to support this. Maybe in the next standards, but that's going to be hard.