3 ms·
I think we're huge technological leaps and bounds--I mean light-years--away from AGI so advanced it requires some form of computer psychology. But I do think it
by vertexFarm 8y ago
I think we're huge technological leaps and bounds--I mean light-years--away from AGI so advanced it requires some form of computer psychology. But I do think it might eventually happen. And I don't think people are going to do a good job of preparing for it proactively. It's going to require a huge fiasco to motivate people to take that idea seriously.
So I agree that one day we may have to be careful how we treat AGI and maintain a system of ethics for the use of artificial, sensate, sapient beings. But that day is hella not today. Yet when it does come, it will probably still sneak up and surprise us. Like most black swans are wont to do.
Right now IBM is using people's confusion of AI with AGI to make sensationalist ads. But hey, most advertising around trending tech is sensationalist.
- ModernMech 8y ago> I think we're huge technological leaps and bounds--I mean light-years--away from AGI so advanced it requires some form of computer psychology. I think you're right about this. I think the current wave of anxiety about the capabilities of AI are fueled by non-practitioners who have no idea really how hard it's going to be.