> "False/misleading videos that perpetuate a scam." You seem to be implying that Jones' videos are truthful/informative and totally-not-a-scam, while the video

> "False/misleading videos that perpetuate a scam." You seem to be implying that Jones' videos are truthful/informative and totally-not-a-scam, while the videos in the article, which actually contained educational content, were false, misleading, and perpetuating a scam. Meanwhile, Jones has a supplement business that pulled an estimated $15 mil over two years (some estimate $25 mil) [1]. Here is a sampling of reviews from an independent lab that tested the substances: - "Both of these products are most likely safe, but ineffective." - "This product is a waste of money. The claim that 'Anthroplex works synergistically with the powerful Super Male Vitality formula in order to help restore your masculine foundation and stimulate vitality with its own blend of unique ingredients' is fluff on multiple fronts." - "This product's claims related to 'nascent oxygen' also have no real basis in science." - "We tested this product on the chance that it might be potassium iodide or sodium iodide, which it wasn't. Survival Shield is just plain iodine." etc. This is a guy who "... repeatedly asserted the Sandy Hook shooting was staged and the parents were liars and frauds who helped in a cover-up" [2]. So, what's your definition of false and/or misleading? [1] https://www.buzzfeed.com/charliewarzel/we-sent-alex-jones-infowars-supplements-to-a-lab-heres?utm_term=.fpY4PnLXD#.obaDbw2ay https://www.buzzfeed.com/charliewarzel/we-sent-alex-jones-in... [2] https://globalnews.ca/news/4149778/sandy-hook-sue-infowars-conspiracy-alex-jones-defamation/ https://globalnews.ca/news/4149778/sandy-hook-sue-infowars-c... EDIT: it seems I misread the intent of the post above mine. My apologies. I'll leave my response up for reference.