4 ms·
sure, feel free to use any of these alternative services that offer a large potential reach and allow easy monetization of user content:
by LoSboccacc 9y ago
sure, feel free to use any of these alternative services that offer a large potential reach and allow easy monetization of user content:
- s73v3r_ 9y agoNone of the alternative services will get there if no one is willing to use them. There is always the old fashioned way of getting sponsors yourself and hosting the video on your site.
- akvadrako 9y agoand it's not like youtube pays out very well - it's 90% towards google at the minimum.
- musage 9y agoWhich makes their behavior in relation to ElsaGate -- how long they ignored reports and pleas, and how they either did or published zero serious investigation of the issue -- even more disgusting. They could donate the ad money they made from videos aimed at abusing children, knowingly or not, to charities helping abused children, or something like that. But no, instead they used the occasion to brag and pat themselves on the back. Observe how they treat the defenseless, and how they treat those with clout. It speaks volumes.
- kirykl 9y agoin the US you have a right to free speech, not mass reach
- girvo 9y agoThen that definition of free speech ignores the changes in culture and communication, no? (I’m not even disagreeing with you, I’m more curious here. This article and discussion has brought up interesting points I think)
- LoSboccacc 9y agoHe’s right about free speech. Even in countries where free speech is a right, it is strictly defined as government can’t punish you for your opinion. Private companies can show users the door at any time. What I fail to see is what has his retort about free speech anything to do with my comment on the youtube monopolistic position.