3 ms·
> All Model 3's DO have the HARDWARE to support full-self driving, even if the software is not there. Please provide evidence. Given that the only full-self d
by ucaetano 9y ago
> All Model 3's DO have the HARDWARE to support full-self driving, even if the software is not there.
Please provide evidence.
Given that the only full-self driving system out there is Waymo's, which uses completely different hardware than Tesla's, it is impossible to back your claim, unless you develop a fully-self-driving system on top of Tesla's hardware.
So until that is done, your claim is false, no matter how many caps you use.
- hacker11235 9y agoSure, they have cameras to see and a computer to do rigorous processing. We can compare this to a human, who uses their vision to perceive the outside world while driving. (You could also argue humans use their hearing, well the Tesla's have mic's if they really wanted to use that).
- ucaetano 9y ago> they have cameras to see and a computer to do rigorous processing. We can compare this to a human, who uses their vision to perceive the outside world while driving My phone also has cameras and a processor. Are you implying that my phone is as equipped to drive a car as a human? A monkey has eyes, a brain, arms and legs. Are you implying that a monkey is as equipped to drive a car as a human?
- hacker11235 9y agoI'd say the monkey has most of the hardware but not the software, analogously. As for the phone, right I was assuming the cars have enough processing power and memory to do the necessary processing. But granted they haven't exemplified full self-driving on their current hardware, I will have to concede that we do not know how much processing and power are needed to be truly self-driving. For all we know, that last 10% of self-driving capability may require an exponential increase in the amount of processing required.