4 ms·
37signals has a related post: http://37signals.com/svn/posts/2283-ranking-tech-companies-by-revenue-per-employee http://37signals.com/svn/posts/2283-ranking-te
by prs 16y ago
37signals has a related post:
http://37signals.com/svn/posts/2283-ranking-tech-companies-by-revenue-per-employee http://37signals.com/svn/posts/2283-ranking-tech-companies-b...
I have not checked their figures but in the case of these companies, the proposed 100K formula is mostly way off the mark.
As for NASDAQ-100 companies, the following chart is very informative:
http://www.jbryanscott.com/2009/02/07/nasdaq-100-revenue-per-employee/ http://www.jbryanscott.com/2009/02/07/nasdaq-100-revenue-per...
- barmstrong 16y agoI think the 37Signals post was meant to show outliers (how high it could go if you are awesome). But that NASDAQ-100 post is insightful. It would probably be safe to say top companies exceed $100k per employee when doing well.