3 ms·
I think the most puzzling part of the article for me was that the article says they've only been doing testing for this for two years now. I'm sure I'm missing
by rando444 9y ago
I think the most puzzling part of the article for me was that the article says they've only been doing testing for this for two years now.
I'm sure I'm missing some critical piece of information, but this seems like something that agencies should have started testing for decades ago.
- knieveltech 9y agoI'm guessing the critical piece of information you're missing is the FDA, like most government agencies that aren't the military, suffers from chronic underfunding and lobby-funded political agendas.
- rando444 9y agoNot arguing that, but we're talking about Roundup, which we know is a health hazard and used everywhere. As a layperson, if the FDA hasn't been testing for this, it makes you wonder what they have been testing for.. or rather, it almost makes one feel like they haven't been testing food samples at all for 50+ years.. which even with an underfunded agency, would be shocking.
- knieveltech 8y agoWe are in violent agreement here.
- stevenwoo 9y agoFrom the sources linked in the article there appears to be quite a bit of pushback from Monsanto to even test that infiltrated the Department of Agriculture (FDA and Department of Agriculture appear to have some overlapping responsibilities to test to standards created by EPA), there was some movement by 2016 but that was all cancelled by the new administration, doubt we'll see any progress in the USA unless Canada and EU start testing their imports from USA and banning contaminated imports.