3 ms·
Absolutely, for its intended use case (hookups), it's absolutely a far more efficient and utilitarian interface. But for dating, I think it's pretty lousy. Bu
by magduf 9y ago
Absolutely, for its intended use case (hookups), it's absolutely a far more efficient and utilitarian interface.
But for dating, I think it's pretty lousy. But as you said, most people (over the age of 30 I suspect) seem to use it for dating, not casual sex. And they're right to use it for that, because even though it's lousy IMO, it's where everyone is, and despite the rest of the UI being lousy for selecting quality matches IMO, the killer feature is the fact that both parties have to "like" each other. Why other dating sites like OKcupid don't adopt this, I have no idea, except maybe it's not good for their business model in their view. For women I've talked to, sites like OKC are just awful because they get so many unsolicited messages; this isn't much of a problem on Tinder and Bumble since they're in control.