5 ms·

I find gallon and cubic feet to be on the same level hogsheads and cubic cubits in terms of applicability and usage. There's no trouble visualising a volume uni

by Y_Y 9y ago

I find gallon and cubic feet to be on the same level hogsheads and cubic cubits in terms of applicability and usage. There's no trouble visualising a volume unit like a litre, particularly if you're used to working with such quantities. It is tough visualising unit that have no traction outside of one metrically-solopsist region though. Also a "football field" isn't constant between football codes (Canadian, Association, Gaelic, Australian, American, etc.) nor even between different grounds in some cases. Not a great unit.

majewsky 9y ago
Is there some standard system of bullshit units that are notoriously underdefined and only used in shitty science/engineering documentaries? Here in Germany, commonly used bullshit units include "soccer field" for area or "VW Golf" for mass.
froindt 9y ago
>Also a "football field" isn't constant between football codes (Canadian, Association, Gaelic, Australian, American, etc.) nor even between different grounds in some cases. Not a great unit. I was going full American here with American football fields (standard 300x160 feet) forgetting about the ambiguity saying "football". I understand your frustration, but having an idea of what 7,000,000 of anything would look like is non-trivial. If it were 7,000,000 cubic meters you might re-express things to be easier to visualize. Unfortunately for the time being, the US is using gallons, so I'm stuck making these comparisons to grasp at what that volume looks like.
- dragonwriter 9y ago
  > I was going full American here with American football fields (standard 300x160 feet) American football fields are 360×160 feet.
  - froindt 9y ago
    I guess end zones count. I had them excluded. Knocks it down to 16.2 feet.
- Y_Y 9y ago
  >Rice is great if you're really hungry and want to eat two thousand of something. - Mitch Hedberg I know what you mean, and I sympathise that it's a difficult problem. I suppose I tend to think of "a billion cubic metres" as more like one big cubic kilometre than a billion small things. There's some art to merging some numbers into units, but I don't know anyone who's solved it.

by Y_Y 9y ago

majewsky 9y ago

Is there some standard system of bullshit units that are notoriously underdefined and only used in shitty science/engineering documentaries? Here in Germany, commonly used bullshit units include "soccer field" for area or "VW Golf" for mass.

froindt 9y ago

>Also a "football field" isn't constant between football codes (Canadian, Association, Gaelic, Australian, American, etc.) nor even between different grounds in some cases. Not a great unit. I was going full American here with American football fields (standard 300x160 feet) forgetting about the ambiguity saying "football". I understand your frustration, but having an idea of what 7,000,000 of anything would look like is non-trivial. If it were 7,000,000 cubic meters you might re-express things to be easier to visualize. Unfortunately for the time being, the US is using gallons, so I'm stuck making these comparisons to grasp at what that volume looks like.

dragonwriter 9y ago
> I was going full American here with American football fields (standard 300x160 feet) American football fields are 360×160 feet.
- froindt 9y ago
  I guess end zones count. I had them excluded. Knocks it down to 16.2 feet.
Y_Y 9y ago
>Rice is great if you're really hungry and want to eat two thousand of something. - Mitch Hedberg I know what you mean, and I sympathise that it's a difficult problem. I suppose I tend to think of "a billion cubic metres" as more like one big cubic kilometre than a billion small things. There's some art to merging some numbers into units, but I don't know anyone who's solved it.