4 ms·
> I'll take a well-informed, nuanced opinion of Dyson, a colleague of Einstein and Feynman ... I'm sorry, but being a colleague of Einstein and Feynman is not
by ahmedalsudani 8y ago
> I'll take a well-informed, nuanced opinion of Dyson, a colleague of Einstein and Feynman ...
I'm sorry, but being a colleague of Einstein and Feynman is not a qualification.
Einstein famously rejected quantum mechanics because he felt that God would not create a world where it can be true. Feynman (a personal hero of mine) did not brush his teeth because he thought there was not sufficient scientific evidence that it helps keep them healthy.
History is full of brilliant people who make mistakes.
Freeman Dyson has not done sufficient research to reach the conclusion that he has, and he certainly hasn't gone back to look at how the predictions have panned out (both from the climate change camp and other one). He is a charlatan when it comes to climate science.
It is not wise to worship any single person and accept their claims uncritically, and an appeal to an authority is usually a weak argument.
- Radim 8y agoI agree with most of what you said. (with the caveat that unless you're an expert yourself, common sense and appeal to authority are about all you have) > Freeman Dyson has not done sufficient research to reach the conclusion that he has Out of curiosity, which conclusion is particular are you talking about? Let's be specific—the strawmen have received enough beating today already.