Climate change seems too much to me like a stick being used to advance an agenda. Whenever a solution is proposed it always dovetails with something the person

Climate change seems too much to me like a stick being used to advance an agenda. Whenever a solution is proposed it always dovetails with something the person proposing it would want anyway. Instapundit - right wing law blogger - used to put up posts that would start "I'll believe Climate Change is a problem when X believes it is" and then link to an article about some celebrity flying 50,000 miles a year or doing something else that put a trillion tons of CO2 into the atmosphere. Good for a laugh I suppose but honestly I wonder if there's not some truth there. Why are the solutions always sold on the basis of "win/win" with the both wins going to the same end of the political spectrum? I understand that it sounds like extortion or blackmail but it seems like if you really want a solution you have to sell it to people who don't agree with your politics not just try and ram it down their throats.