> Its only the end-user-is-product companies that have to have armies of lawyers, and that is no bad thing surely? Note that you're on a site pretty much dedic

> Its only the end-user-is-product companies that have to have armies of lawyers, and that is no bad thing surely? Note that you're on a site pretty much dedicated to the ongoing viability of end-user-is-product companies, hence the backlash here. My experience, same as yours, is that anyone who provides a service for money isn't having any difficulty at all complying with the GDPR.