> Blueorigin's New Shepard does seem more robust. Well, NS was designed for re-usability from the start, while F9 had only re-usability plugged-in later as an

> Blueorigin's New Shepard does seem more robust. Well, NS was designed for re-usability from the start, while F9 had only re-usability plugged-in later as an experimental feature. SpaceX's priority was to get to orbit ASAP in order to be commercially viable. I bet BFR will look much studier than F9.