3 ms·

It's a different problem - I'm part of the Commonwealth. I could host it in a country that would ignore requests, but the point of the website is to do everyth

It's a different problem - I'm part of the Commonwealth. I could host it in a country that would ignore requests, but the point of the website is to do everything correctly. If I hosted my content in a country that doesn't care about copyright or DMCA, I'm putting myself at risk if I was brought into court as I've purposefully skirted around laws. My country has proven we are held to US copyright law - see the Kim DotCom case. What would usually be considered a matter for civil court was brought into criminal court because it crossed borders and unfounded claims were made against the accused (namely money laundering) who's now being extradited. I simply want to provide a free, legal media service to those in my country. There's no money in it - I don't even run AdSense, I simply pay for hosting. So far, so good. If I do get dragged into court, I expect a precedence to be set for future cases. This will also open up a lot of free historical media for government-run TV and streaming services, and local media producers. It's kind of like a weird tech protest against goofy copyright laws.

tripletao 8y ago
But does US law actually require you to respond to the DMCA notice? Like, the provider loses its safe harbor, but if there's no violation of US copyright law then why does that matter? That's perhaps a different test case from the one that you intend, of course...
- Mandatum 8y ago
  US law shouldn't matter to us at all. We shouldn't need to know what a DMCA notice is. A copyright claim should be made in the host country's format applicable to their laws, that doesn't seem to be a reality to any of the claims I've received. Where I am, you should receive an IP rights notice and an interim injunction to remove the works. I've never received anything like that.
DanBC 8y ago
> What would usually be considered a matter for civil court was brought into criminal court because it crossed borders Wasn't it criminal because he was doing it as a business and earning money from it?
- Mandatum 8y ago
  That's still a civil case in New Zealand. It's copyright infringement, you don't go to jail - you get sued and bankrupted. The fact he was making money from it doesn't change the court, he just gets sued for more (in this case, it would have been everything he owned).

tripletao 8y ago

But does US law actually require you to respond to the DMCA notice? Like, the provider loses its safe harbor, but if there's no violation of US copyright law then why does that matter? That's perhaps a different test case from the one that you intend, of course...

Mandatum 8y ago
US law shouldn't matter to us at all. We shouldn't need to know what a DMCA notice is. A copyright claim should be made in the host country's format applicable to their laws, that doesn't seem to be a reality to any of the claims I've received. Where I am, you should receive an IP rights notice and an interim injunction to remove the works. I've never received anything like that.

DanBC 8y ago

> What would usually be considered a matter for civil court was brought into criminal court because it crossed borders Wasn't it criminal because he was doing it as a business and earning money from it?

Mandatum 8y ago
That's still a civil case in New Zealand. It's copyright infringement, you don't go to jail - you get sued and bankrupted. The fact he was making money from it doesn't change the court, he just gets sued for more (in this case, it would have been everything he owned).